• test me

    From Markus Reschke@2:240/1661 to Scott Little on Tue Apr 29 22:46:22 2014
    Hello Scott!

    Apr 30 06:16 2014, Scott Little wrote to All:

    Can someone please test IPv6 binkp connectivity to sysgod.org (2002:cbce:df98::4)? Thanks.

    $ telnet -6 2002:cbce:df98::4 binkp
    Trying 2002:cbce:df98::4...
    Connected to 2002:cbce:df98::4.
    Escape character is '^]'.
    ;OPT ENC-DES-CBC CRAM-MD5-7c268ff5d4819eac1d78d684e06679d3SYS Cyberia TCP/IPZYZ Scott Little
    LOC SydneyPHN sysgod.orgNDL MO,CM,TCP,IFC,TEL,VMP,BND&TIME Tue, 29 Apr 2014 20:46:20 +1000VER Argus/3.210/ binkp/1.0

    Regards,
    Markus

    ---
    * Origin: *** theca tabellaria *** (2:240/1661)
  • From Kees van Eeten@2:280/5003.4 to Scott Little on Tue Apr 29 23:07:48 2014
    Hello Scott!

    30 Apr 14 06:16, you wrote to All:

    I've had an IPv4 > IPv6 relay set up on my system for a while but there haven't been any bites.

    Can someone please test IPv6 binkp connectivity to sysgod.org (2002:cbce:df98::4)? Thanks.

    + 29 Apr 23:04:01 [28400] call to 3:712/848@fidonet
    29 Apr 23:04:01 [28400] trying 2002:cbce:df98::4 [2002:cbce:df98::4]...
    29 Apr 23:04:01 [28400] connected
    + 29 Apr 23:04:01 [28400] outgoing session with 2002:cbce:df98::4
    - 29 Apr 23:04:01 [28400] OPT ENC-DES-CBC CRAM-MD5-142424480fd595d1c4cb4d35b7b7684e
    + 29 Apr 23:04:01 [28400] Remote requests MD mode
    - 29 Apr 23:04:01 [28400] SYS Cyberia TCP/IP
    - 29 Apr 23:04:01 [28400] ZYZ Scott Little
    - 29 Apr 23:04:01 [28400] LOC Sydney
    - 29 Apr 23:04:01 [28400] PHN sysgod.org
    - 29 Apr 23:04:01 [28400] NDL MO,CM,TCP,IFC,TEL,VMP,BND
    - 29 Apr 23:04:01 [28400] TIME Tue, 29 Apr 2014 21:04:01 +1000
    - 29 Apr 23:04:01 [28400] VER Argus/3.210/ binkp/1.0
    + 29 Apr 23:04:01 [28400] addr: 3:712/848@fidonet
    + 29 Apr 23:04:01 [28400] addr: 3:712/0@fidonet
    + 29 Apr 23:04:01 [28400] addr: 3:3/0@fidonet
    + 29 Apr 23:04:02 [28400] done (to 3:712/848@fidonet, OK, S/R: 0/0 (0/0 bytes))
    29 Apr 23:04:02 [28400] session closed, quitting...

    I get varying results from dns when I resolve sysgod.org, so I had to
    force the address.

    host sysgod.org
    sysgod.org has address 203.206.223.152
    sysgod.org has IPv6 address 2002:cbce:df98::4

    But binkd finds:

    + 29 Apr 23:01:40 [27824] call to 3:712/848@fidonet
    29 Apr 23:01:40 [27824] trying sysgod.org [2002:cbce:df9b::1]...

    I am still looking for tha cause.

    Kees

    --- FPD v2.9.040207 GoldED+/LNX 1.1.5
    * Origin: As for me, all I know is that, I know nothing. (2:280/5003.4)
  • From Kees van Eeten@2:280/5003.4 to Scott Little on Tue Apr 29 23:22:26 2014
    Hello Scott!

    30 Apr 14 06:16, you wrote to All:

    I've had an IPv4 > IPv6 relay set up on my system for a while but there haven't been any bites.

    Can someone please test IPv6 binkp connectivity to sysgod.org (2002:cbce:df98::4)? Thanks.

    I had identical results and dns problems when calling from 2:280/5006

    Kees

    --- FPD v2.9.040207 GoldED+/LNX 1.1.5
    * Origin: As for me, all I know is that, I know nothing. (2:280/5003.4)
  • From Michiel van der Vlist@2:280/5555 to Scott Little on Tue Apr 29 23:03:33 2014
    Hello Scott,

    On Wednesday April 30 2014 06:16, you wrote to All:

    I've had an IPv4 > IPv6 relay set up on my system for a while but
    there haven't been any bites.

    If you do not advertise it by adding an AAAA record to sysgod.org....

    Can someone please test IPv6 binkp connectivity to sysgod.org (2002:cbce:df98::4)? Thanks.

    23:03 [8460] BEGIN standalone, binkd/1.1a-49/Win32 -p -P3:712/848 binkd.cfg
    ? 23:03 [8460] Cannot find domain for zone 3, assuming 'fidonet'
    23:03 [8460] creating a poll for 3:712/848@fidonet (`d' flavour)
    23:03 [8460] clientmgr started
    + 23:03 [8688] call to 3:712/848@fidonet
    23:03 [8688] trying 2002:cbce:df98::4 [2002:cbce:df98::4]...
    23:03 [8688] connected
    + 23:03 [8688] outgoing session with 2002:cbce:df98::4

    Welcome to the club!

    How about outgoing?

    Cheers, Michiel

    --- GoldED+/W32-MINGW 1.1.5-b20110320
    * Origin: 2001:470:1f15:1117::1 (2:280/5555)
  • From Kees van Eeten@2:280/5003.4 to Scott Little on Tue Apr 29 23:35:18 2014
    Hello Scott!

    30 Apr 14 06:16, you wrote to All:

    Can someone please test IPv6 binkp connectivity to sysgod.org (2002:cbce:df98::4)? Thanks.

    I do not have the DNS problem when I use chloe.rtscts.net
    however I have to force Binkd to ipv6.

    The forcing to ipv6 is also required with a node in Finland.

    I have no idea, why this is neccessary, ipv6 normally prvails over ipv4.

    Kees

    --- FPD v2.9.040207 GoldED+/LNX 1.1.5
    * Origin: As for me, all I know is that, I know nothing. (2:280/5003.4)
  • From Michiel van der Vlist@2:280/5555 to Scott Little on Wed Apr 30 00:24:11 2014
    Hello Scott,

    Tuesday April 29 2014 23:03, I wrote to you:

    I've had an IPv4 > IPv6 relay set up on my system for a while but
    there haven't been any bites.

    If you do not advertise it by adding an AAAA record to sysgod.org....

    There seems to be a DNS problem. I had to explicitly add your IPv6 address to binkd.cfg to make the connection. When just fed with sysgod.org, binkd resolves the IPv4 address and make the connection via IPv4.

    I can also make an IPv6 connect with sysgod.org by explicitly forcing binkd to IPv6.

    When I ping from my windows machine, I get the IPv4 address. I have to explicitly do a ping6 to sysgod.org to get the IPv6 address.

    It looks your system is setup to prefer IPv4 over IPv6. Odd....

    What IPv6 connection do you have? Native? Tunnel? Which provider?


    Cheers, Michiel

    --- GoldED+/W32-MINGW 1.1.5-b20110320
    * Origin: 2001:470:1f15:1117::1 (2:280/5555)
  • From Rudi Timmermans@2:562/140 to Scott Little on Wed Apr 30 06:54:26 2014
    Hi Scott!

    Answering a msg of <30 Apr 14>, from you to Kees van Eeten:

    Do have EleBBS support for Ip6 ?

    Best regards!
    Rudi Timmermans.

    --- X-TReMe BBS - Telnet:xtremebbs.dyndns.info:1024
    * Origin: X-TReMe BBS - Telnet:xtremebbs.dyndns.info:1024 (2:562/140@FidoNet)
  • From Rudi Timmermans@2:562/140 to Kees van Eeten on Wed Apr 30 07:01:15 2014
    Hi Kees!

    29 Apr 14 23:35, you wrote to Scott Little:

    Kees can you please test my Ipv6 connection of Binkd i hope it works ;)

    2a02:1811:901:5a00:9cdc:b4eb:e92b:aeb4 24554

    Thanks!


    Best regards!
    Rudi Timmermans.

    --- X-TReMe BBS - Telnet:xtremebbs.dyndns.info:1024
    * Origin: X-TReMe BBS - Telnet:xtremebbs.dyndns.info:1024 (2:562/140@FidoNet)
  • From Michiel van der Vlist@2:280/5555 to Scott Little on Wed Apr 30 10:59:05 2014
    Hello Scott,

    On Wednesday April 30 2014 12:34, you wrote to me:

    [2002:cbce:df98::4]... 23:03 [8688] connected + 23:03 [8688]
    outgoing session with 2002:cbce:df98::4 Welcome to the club!

    Thanks!

    You'r the first in Z3.

    How about outgoing?

    Outgoing I probably won't bother with until either we start getting
    enough IPv6 only nodes to cause trouble, or until my ISP goes native
    IPv6 (which will be sometime around the heat death of the universe).

    I am a bit surprised the ISPs down undah don't put more pressure on it. APNIC was the first RIR to deplete its IPv4 stock three years ago. By now IPv4 adresses should be scarse in the ASIAN-PACIFIC region.

    Do I remember correctly there being talk about a flag for v6-only
    nodes?

    An FTSC proposal was filed. Now I will have to convince Ward to allow the INO4 flag it for 2:280/5006.

    ATM I'm using 6to4,

    6to4, Arghhh, that explains a few things.

    which for some reason my ISP managed to partially break

    You can blame your ISP for choosing 6to4 as their official method for IP46, you can not blame them for breaking it. 6to4 is broken all by itself! Hunt the net for "problems with 6to4" and you wil get lots of articles.

    The brokennes of 6to4 is the main reason why most OS's/applications first try IPv4 instead of IPv6. Windows normally tries IPv6 first, but if the destination is a 6to4 tunnel, it only tries IPv6 if Ipv4 fails.

    That explains why you did nog get any IPv6 connect until you asked for it and me and others sepcifically forced IPv6 to make the connection.

    - it works from some of my IPs but not others (confirmed on
    their end). How they managed the screw up routing for half the IPs in
    the same subnet to their own 6to4 gateway is beyond me. Hopefully
    they don't break it any more.

    When I get a round tuit I'll set up their 6RD tunnel as well.

    Forget about 6RD.

    I suggest you get a decent 6in4 or AYIYA tunnel from a decent tunnel broker like he.net or SixXs.


    Cheers, Michiel

    --- GoldED+/W32-MINGW 1.1.5-b20110320
    * Origin: 2001:470:1f15:1117::1 (2:280/5555)
  • From Kees van Eeten@2:280/5003.4 to Rudi Timmermans on Wed Apr 30 12:13:08 2014
    Hello Rudi!

    30 Apr 14 07:01, you wrote to me:

    Kees can you please test my Ipv6 connection of Binkd i hope it works ;) 2a02:1811:901:5a00:9cdc:b4eb:e92b:aeb4 24554

    To bad.

    + 30 Apr 12:10:47 [16607] call to 2:562/140@fidonet
    30 Apr 12:10:47 [16607] trying 2a02:1811:901:5a00:9cdc:b4eb:e92b:aeb4 [2a02:1811:901:5a00:9cdc:b4eb:e92b:aeb4]:24554...
    ? 30 Apr 12:11:08 [16607] connection to 2:562/140@fidonet failed: Connection timed out

    I get the same result if I try a telnet to that address and port number.

    An initial safe setup usually does not allow incoming IPv6, so you may have
    to open some ports.

    Kees

    --- FPD v2.9.040207 GoldED+/LNX 1.1.5
    * Origin: As for me, all I know is that, I know nothing. (2:280/5003.4)
  • From Tommi Koivula@2:221/360 to Scott Little on Wed Apr 30 13:23:58 2014
    On 29.4.2014 23:16, Scott Little -> All wrote:

    I've had an IPv4 > IPv6 relay set up on my system for a while but there haven't been any bites.

    Can someone please test IPv6 binkp connectivity to sysgod.org (2002:cbce:df98::4)? Thanks.

    13:22 [2856] call to 3:712/848@fidonet
    13:22 [2856] trying f848.n712.z3.binkp.net [2002:cbce:df98::4]...
    13:22 [2856] connected
    13:22 [2856] outgoing session with chloe.rtscts.net [2002:cbce:df98::4]
    13:22 [2856] OPT ENC-DES-CBC CRAM-MD5-50740e03a3ceaf1caa09c25fdd1a0078
    13:22 [2856] Remote requests MD mode
    13:22 [2856] SYS Cyberia TCP/IP
    13:22 [2856] ZYZ Scott Little
    13:22 [2856] LOC Sydney
    13:22 [2856] PHN sysgod.org
    13:22 [2856] NDL MO,CM,TCP,IFC,TEL,VMP,BND
    13:22 [2856] TIME Wed, 30 Apr 2014 10:22:13 +1000
    13:22 [2856] VER Argus/3.210/ binkp/1.0
    13:22 [2856] addr: 3:712/848@fidonet
    13:22 [2856] addr: 3:712/0@fidonet
    13:22 [2856] addr: 3:3/0@fidonet
    13:22 [2856] addr: 115:6000/0@pascalnt (n/a or busy)
    13:22 [2856] addr: 115:6000/1@pascalnt (n/a or busy)
    13:22 [2856] addr: 115:6100/0@pascalnt (n/a or busy)
    13:22 [2856] addr: 115:6100/1@pascalnt (n/a or busy)
    13:22 [2856] addr: 115:6101/0@pascalnt (n/a or busy)
    13:22 [2856] addr: 115:6101/1@pascalnt (n/a or busy)
    13:22 [2856] addr: 169:1/125@battle (n/a or busy)
    13:22 [2856] done (to 3:712/848@fidonet, OK, S/R: 0/0 (0/0 bytes))
    13:22 [2856] session closed, quitting...

    'Tommi

    --- Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.5.0
    * Origin: *** nntp://rbb.bbs.fi *** Lake Ylo *** Finland *** (2:221/360)
  • From Kees van Eeten@2:280/5003.4 to Scott Little on Wed Apr 30 12:42:46 2014
    Hello Scott!

    30 Apr 14 12:25, you wrote to me:

    Aha! Oops ;)

    I had a SRV record set up for another IP, but only configured the 6 to 4 forwarding for one of them. I've removed the SRV record for now, I'll fix it properly later.

    + 30 Apr 12:39:52 [24178] call to 3:712/848@fidonet
    30 Apr 12:39:54 [24178] trying sysgod.org [2002:cbce:df98::4]...
    30 Apr 12:39:54 [24178] connected
    + 30 Apr 12:39:54 [24178] outgoing session with 2002:cbce:df98::4
    - 30 Apr 12:39:54 [24178] OPT ENC-DES-CBC CRAM-MD5-498af8b76098270c0418f89b8c4232b7
    + 30 Apr 12:39:54 [24178] Remote requests MD mode
    - 30 Apr 12:39:54 [24178] SYS Cyberia TCP/IP
    - 30 Apr 12:39:54 [24178] ZYZ Scott Little
    - 30 Apr 12:39:54 [24178] LOC Sydney
    - 30 Apr 12:39:54 [24178] PHN sysgod.org
    - 30 Apr 12:39:54 [24178] NDL MO,CM,TCP,IFC,TEL,VMP,BND
    - 30 Apr 12:39:54 [24178] TIME Wed, 30 Apr 2014 10:39:54 +1000
    - 30 Apr 12:39:54 [24178] VER Argus/3.210/ binkp/1.0
    + 30 Apr 12:39:54 [24178] addr: 3:712/848@fidonet
    + 30 Apr 12:39:54 [24178] addr: 3:712/0@fidonet
    + 30 Apr 12:39:54 [24178] addr: 3:3/0@fidonet
    + 30 Apr 12:39:55 [24178] done (to 3:712/848@fidonet, OK, S/R: 0/0 (0/0 bytes))
    30 Apr 12:39:55 [24178] session closed, quitting...

    O.K. that works now, I had to flush my DNS cache first.
    There is still the preference for ipv4, but Michiel elaborated on that.


    Kees

    --- FPD v2.9.040207 GoldED+/LNX 1.1.5
    * Origin: As for me, all I know is that, I know nothing. (2:280/5003.4)
  • From Rudi Timmermans@2:562/140 to Kees van Eeten on Wed Apr 30 13:16:36 2014
    Hi Kees!

    30 Apr 14 12:13, you wrote to me:

    To bad.

    + 30 Apr 12:10:47 [16607] call to 2:562/140@fidonet
    30 Apr 12:10:47 [16607] trying 2a02:1811:901:5a00:9cdc:b4eb:e92b:aeb4 [2a02:1811:901:5a00:9cdc:b4eb:e92b:aeb4]:24554... ? 30 Apr 12:11:08 [16607] connection to 2:562/140@fidonet failed: Connection timed out

    I get the same result if I try a telnet to that address and port number.

    An initial safe setup usually does not allow incoming IPv6, so you may have to open some ports.

    Strange i need to check my firewall again that port is open when i do it local it works and also Dyndns see my Ipv6 adress like that...


    Best regards!
    Rudi Timmermans.

    --- X-TReMe BBS - Telnet:xtremebbs.dyndns.info:1024
    * Origin: X-TReMe BBS - Telnet:xtremebbs.dyndns.info:1024 (2:562/140@FidoNet)
  • From Kees van Eeten@2:280/5003.4 to Rudi Timmermans on Wed Apr 30 14:30:12 2014
    Hello Rudi!

    30 Apr 14 13:16, you wrote to me:

    + 30 Apr 12:10:47 [16607] call to 2:562/140@fidonet
    30 Apr 12:10:47 [16607] trying
    2a02:1811:901:5a00:9cdc:b4eb:e92b:aeb4
    [2a02:1811:901:5a00:9cdc:b4eb:e92b:aeb4]:24554... ? 30 Apr 12:11:08
    [16607] connection to 2:562/140@fidonet failed: Connection timed out

    I get the same result if I try a telnet to that address and port
    number.

    An initial safe setup usually does not allow incoming IPv6, so you
    may have to open some ports.

    Strange i need to check my firewall again that port is open when i do it local it works and also Dyndns see my Ipv6 adress like that...

    Your xtremebbs.dyndns.info presents a different Ipv6 address

    ~$ host xtremebbs.dyndns.info
    xtremebbs.dyndns.info has address 94.224.25.65
    xtremebbs.dyndns.info has IPv6 address 2a02:1811:901:5a00:9038:5f7:535f:b0d1

    But there a get a timeout as well.

    Kees

    --- FPD v2.9.040207 GoldED+/LNX 1.1.5
    * Origin: As for me, all I know is that, I know nothing. (2:280/5003.4)
  • From Rudi Timmermans@1:261/38 to Kees Van Eeten on Wed Apr 30 08:52:42 2014
    Hi Kees,

    Can you try again please i have test it with a online port scanner and now it should work, there was a problem with my firewall rule on my ISP settings!

    See results:

    Checked port 24554 on Host/IP 2a02:1811:901:5a00:9038:5f7:535f:b0d1...

    The checked port (24554, service binkp) is online/reachable!

    Completed portscan in 0.0135 seconds

    Thanks!

    Rudi

    --- BBBS/Li6 v4.10 Dada-1
    * Origin: Prism bbs (1:261/38)
  • From Rudi Timmermans@1:261/38 to Kees Van Eeten on Wed Apr 30 08:54:28 2014
    Hi Kees,

    xtremebbs.dyndns.info has address 94.224.25.65
    xtremebbs.dyndns.info has IPv6 address 2a02:1811:901:5a00:9038:5f7:535f:b0d1 But there a get a timeout as well.

    Yes that will not works becoss Net2BBS it running on that and can not handle Ipv6 only Ipv4

    And the only ports are open for ipv4 are 1024 and 24554.

    But like i told on the binkd Ipv6 24554 it should work now see my other echomail...

    Thanks!

    Rudi

    --- BBBS/Li6 v4.10 Dada-1
    * Origin: Prism bbs (1:261/38)
  • From Kees van Eeten@2:280/5003.4 to Rudi Timmermans on Wed Apr 30 16:32:32 2014
    Hello Rudi!

    30 Apr 14 08:52, you wrote to me:

    Can you try again please i have test it with a online port scanner and now it should work, there was a problem with my firewall rule on my ISP settings!

    Well that solved your problem.

    Congradulations.

    30 Apr 16:31:15 [18914] trying xtremebbs.dyndns.info [2a02:1811:901:5a00:9038:5f7:535f:b0d1]...
    30 Apr 16:31:15 [18914] connected
    + 30 Apr 16:31:15 [18914] outgoing session with 2a02:1811:901:5a00:9038:5f7:535f:b0d1
    - 30 Apr 16:31:15 [18914] OPT CRAM-MD5-a8bc873029850f2de9364c60ad99caee
    + 30 Apr 16:31:15 [18914] Remote requests MD mode
    - 30 Apr 16:31:15 [18914] SYS X-TReMe BBS
    - 30 Apr 16:31:15 [18914] ZYZ The Doctor
    - 30 Apr 16:31:15 [18914] LOC Leuven, Belgium
    - 30 Apr 16:31:15 [18914] NDL 115200,TCP,BINKP
    - 30 Apr 16:31:15 [18914] TIME Wed, 30 Apr 2014 16:31:12 +0200
    - 30 Apr 16:31:15 [18914] VER binkd/1.1a-49/Win32 binkp/1.1
    + 30 Apr 16:31:15 [18914] addr: 2:562/140@fidonet
    - 30 Apr 16:31:15 [18914] OPT EXTCMD
    + 30 Apr 16:31:15 [18914] done (to 2:562/140@fidonet, OK, S/R: 0/0 (0/0 bytes))
    30 Apr 16:31:15 [18914] session closed, quitting...


    Kees

    --- FPD v2.9.040207 GoldED+/LNX 1.1.5
    * Origin: As for me, all I know is that, I know nothing. (2:280/5003.4)
  • From Kees van Eeten@2:280/5006.4 to Rudi Timmermans on Wed Apr 30 16:38:36 2014

    Hello Rudi!

    xtremebbs.dyndns.info has address 94.224.25.65
    xtremebbs.dyndns.info has IPv6 address
    2a02:1811:901:5a00:9038:5f7:535f:b0d1 But there a get a timeout as well.

    Yes that will not works becoss Net2BBS it running on that and can not handle Ipv6 only Ipv4

    And the only ports are open for ipv4 are 1024 and 24554.

    But like i told on the binkd Ipv6 24554 it should work now see my other echomail...

    You initially asked to connect to 2a02:1811:901:5a00:9cdc:b4eb:e92b:aeb4
    Should I get a connect there as well?

    The xtremebbs.dyndns.info directs to:

    2a02:1811:901:5a00:9038:5f7:535f:b0d1

    that is where I get this connection:

    30 Apr 16:34:51 [8502] trying xtremebbs.dyndns.info [2a02:1811:901:5a00:9038:5f7:535f:b0d1]...
    30 Apr 16:34:51 [8502] connected
    + 30 Apr 16:34:51 [8502] outgoing session with 2a02:1811:901:5a00:9038:5f7:535f:b0d1
    - 30 Apr 16:34:51 [8502] OPT CRAM-MD5-31a2f4559b675adc02abe33a5072d9ee
    + 30 Apr 16:34:51 [8502] Remote requests MD mode
    - 30 Apr 16:34:51 [8502] SYS X-TReMe BBS
    - 30 Apr 16:34:51 [8502] ZYZ The Doctor
    - 30 Apr 16:34:51 [8502] LOC Leuven, Belgium
    - 30 Apr 16:34:51 [8502] NDL 115200,TCP,BINKP
    - 30 Apr 16:34:51 [8502] TIME Wed, 30 Apr 2014 16:34:47 +0200
    - 30 Apr 16:34:51 [8502] VER binkd/1.1a-49/Win32 binkp/1.1
    + 30 Apr 16:34:51 [8502] addr: 2:562/140@fidonet
    - 30 Apr 16:34:51 [8502] OPT EXTCMD
    + 30 Apr 16:34:51 [8502] done (to 2:562/140@fidonet, OK, S/R: 0/0 (0/0 bytes))
    30 Apr 16:34:51 [8502] session closed, quitting...

    By the way, this is from a different host.


    Kees


    --- FPD v2.9.040207 GoldED+/LNX 1.1.5--b20130910
    * Origin: As for me, all I know is that, I know nothing. (2:280/5006.4)
  • From Rudi Timmermans@1:261/38 to Kees Van Eeten on Wed Apr 30 10:55:54 2014
    Hello Rudi!
    30 Apr 14 08:52, you wrote to me:
    Can you try again please i have test it with a online port scanner and now >> it should work, there was a problem with my firewall rule on my ISP
    settings!
    Well that solved your problem.
    Congradulations.
    30 Apr 16:31:15 [18914] trying xtremebbs.dyndns.info [2a02:1811:901:5a00:9038:5f7:535f:b0d1]...
    30 Apr 16:31:15 [18914] connected
    + 30 Apr 16:31:15 [18914] outgoing session with 2a02:1811:901:5a00:9038:5f7:535f:b0d1
    - 30 Apr 16:31:15 [18914] OPT CRAM-MD5-a8bc873029850f2de9364c60ad99caee
    + 30 Apr 16:31:15 [18914] Remote requests MD mode
    - 30 Apr 16:31:15 [18914] SYS X-TReMe BBS
    - 30 Apr 16:31:15 [18914] ZYZ The Doctor
    - 30 Apr 16:31:15 [18914] LOC Leuven, Belgium
    - 30 Apr 16:31:15 [18914] NDL 115200,TCP,BINKP
    - 30 Apr 16:31:15 [18914] TIME Wed, 30 Apr 2014 16:31:12 +0200
    - 30 Apr 16:31:15 [18914] VER binkd/1.1a-49/Win32 binkp/1.1
    + 30 Apr 16:31:15 [18914] addr: 2:562/140@fidonet
    - 30 Apr 16:31:15 [18914] OPT EXTCMD
    + 30 Apr 16:31:15 [18914] done (to 2:562/140@fidonet, OK, S/R: 0/0 (0/0 bytes)
    30 Apr 16:31:15 [18914] session closed, quitting...

    Thanks Kees!

    Greetings,

    Rudi

    --- BBBS/Li6 v4.10 Dada-1
    * Origin: Prism bbs (1:261/38)
  • From Björn Felten@2:203/2 to Scott Little on Wed Apr 30 17:41:03 2014
    Can someone please test IPv6 binkp connectivity to sysgod.org (2002:cbce:df98::4)? Thanks.

    Ping6 works, with very slow response, but doesn't seem to resolve to an IPv6 address properly?

    Traceroute6 doesn't work at all.

    As of 15:40 UTC.

    --- Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; sv-SE; rv:1.9.1.16) Gecko/20101125
    * Origin: news://felten.yi.org (2:203/2)
  • From Scott Little@3:712/848 to All on Wed Apr 30 06:16:00 2014
    Hi all,

    I've had an IPv4 > IPv6 relay set up on my system for a while but there haven't been any bites.

    Can someone please test IPv6 binkp connectivity to sysgod.org (2002:cbce:df98::4)? Thanks.


    --- Home is where you hang your @
    * Origin: sysgod@sysgod.org (3:712/848)
  • From Scott Little@3:712/848 to Kees van Eeten on Wed Apr 30 12:25:01 2014

    [ On 2014-04-29 at 23:07:48, Kees van Eeten wrote to Scott Little ]

    host sysgod.org
    sysgod.org has address 203.206.223.152
    sysgod.org has IPv6 address 2002:cbce:df98::4
    But binkd finds:
    + 29 Apr 23:01:40 [27824] call to 3:712/848@fidonet
    29 Apr 23:01:40 [27824] trying sysgod.org [2002:cbce:df9b::1]...

    Aha! Oops ;)

    I had a SRV record set up for another IP, but only configured the 6 to 4 forwarding for one of them. I've removed the SRV record for now, I'll fix it properly later.

    Thanks.


    --- Protip: Never go full retard.
    * Origin: sysgod@sysgod.org (3:712/848)
  • From Scott Little@3:712/848 to Michiel van der Vlist on Wed Apr 30 12:34:02 2014

    [ On 2014-04-29 at 23:03:32, Michiel van der Vlist wrote to Scott Little ]

    [2002:cbce:df98::4]... 23:03 [8688] connected + 23:03 [8688] outgoing session with 2002:cbce:df98::4
    Welcome to the club!

    Thanks!

    How about outgoing?

    Outgoing I probably won't bother with until either we start getting enough IPv6 only nodes to cause trouble, or until my ISP goes native IPv6 (which will be sometime around the heat death of the universe). Do I remember correctly there being talk about a flag for v6-only nodes?

    ATM I'm using 6to4, which for some reason my ISP managed to partially break - it works from some of my IPs but not others (confirmed on their end). How they managed the screw up routing for half the IPs in the same subnet to their own 6to4 gateway is beyond me. Hopefully they don't break it any more.

    When I get a round tuit I'll set up their 6RD tunnel as well. I haven't been in a hurry to do that since it doesn't do RDNS, which means I can't do SMTP over it without hitting spam filters, but it'll be fine for the BBS. Since 6RD is their official(ly well hidden) IPv6 Trial{tm} method, so hopefully they won't break that until native v6 happens.


    --- There is no spoon.
    * Origin: sysgod@sysgod.org (3:712/848)
  • From Scott Little@3:712/848 to Rudi Timmermans on Wed Apr 30 23:47:03 2014

    [ On 2014-04-30 at 06:54:26, Rudi Timmermans wrote to Scott Little ]

    Do have EleBBS support for Ip6 ?

    No. If the Net2BBS thing doesn't work out I'll see what I can do.

    --- Sodding, blimey, shagging, knickers, bollocks, oh God! I'm English! -Spike
    * Origin: sysgod@sysgod.org (3:712/848)
  • From Scott Little@3:712/848 to Michiel van der Vlist on Wed Apr 30 23:58:04 2014

    [ On 2014-04-30 at 10:59:04, Michiel van der Vlist wrote to Scott Little ]

    I am a bit surprised the ISPs down undah don't put more pressure on
    it. APNIC was the first RIR to deplete its IPv4 stock three years ago.
    By now IPv4 adresses should be scarse in the ASIAN-PACIFIC region.

    I think we got in early while there were still plenty of addresses to go around. Developing countries with larger populations/growing markets weren't so lucky. I hear China's been on the IPv6 bandwagon for a while.

    The brokennes of 6to4 is the main reason why most OS's/applications
    first try IPv4 instead of IPv6. Windows normally tries IPv6 first, but
    if the destination is a 6to4 tunnel, it only tries IPv6 if Ipv4 fails.

    That's rather intelligent of them. *stunned*

    Forget about 6RD.

    What's wrong with 6RD?

    I suggest you get a decent 6in4 or AYIYA tunnel from a decent tunnel broker like he.net or SixXs.

    Hurricane don't have any local POPs. Six have one in NZ and they support RDNS, so that might be the way to go. None of the other tunnel providers in Oz do RDNS so they're out.


    --- Are you into casual sex, or should I dress up?
    * Origin: sysgod@sysgod.org (3:712/848)
  • From Scott Little@3:712/848 to Björn Felten on Thu May 1 03:23:46 2014

    [ On 2014-04-30 at 17:41:02, Bj”rn Felten wrote to Scott Little ]

    Ping6 works, with very slow response, but doesn't seem to resolve
    to an IPv6 address properly?
    Traceroute6 doesn't work at all.

    Doesn't surprise me.. 6to4 can be a bit like that since it depends on often public gateways and anycast routing. I'll get a proper tunnel set up when I get a chance.

    --- You are so anal you could hoover the carpet with your arse.
    * Origin: sysgod@sysgod.org (3:712/848)
  • From Björn Felten@2:203/2 to Scott Little on Wed Apr 30 19:34:24 2014
    Doesn't surprise me.. 6to4 can be a bit like that since it depends on often public gateways and anycast routing. I'll get a proper tunnel set
    up when I get a chance.

    Fair enough. Keep on working Scott. That's what I did, and eventually, with the help from the kind participants in this echo, got it half way working. 8-)

    --- Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; sv-SE; rv:1.9.1.16) Gecko/20101125
    * Origin: news://felten.yi.org (2:203/2)
  • From Rudi Timmermans@1:261/38 to Scott Little on Wed Apr 30 13:04:12 2014
    Hi Scott,

    No. If the Net2BBS thing doesn't work out I'll see what I can do.

    The problem for Mike is that hi can not test it, hi dont have Ipv6 and there are also problems with his assambly code hi told me so hi is not shure if hi can get it to Ipv6 support....


    Greetings,

    Rudi

    --- BBBS/Li6 v4.10 Dada-1
    * Origin: Prism bbs (1:261/38)
  • From Benny Pedersen@1:261/38.20 to Scott Little on Wed Apr 30 21:28:12 2014
    Hello Scott!

    30 Apr 2014 12:25, Scott Little wrote to Kees van Eeten:

    I had a SRV record set up for another IP, but only configured the 6 to
    4 forwarding for one of them. I've removed the SRV record for now,
    I'll fix it properly later.

    just one hostname with both a and aaaa, then its solved, post the hostname in nodelist, be happy

    "dig linode.junc.eu a"
    "dig linode.junc.eu aaaa"

    this way, just with your own hostname :)


    Regards Benny

    ... there can only be one way of life, and it works :)

    --- Msged/LNX 6.2.0 (Linux/3.13.11-gentoo (i686))
    * Origin: duggi.junc.org where qico is waiting (1:261/38.20)
  • From Benny Pedersen@1:261/38.20 to Rudi Timmermans on Wed Apr 30 21:33:56 2014
    Hello Rudi!

    30 Apr 2014 07:01, Rudi Timmermans wrote to Kees van Eeten:

    2a02:1811:901:5a00:9cdc:b4eb:e92b:aeb4 24554

    ping ipv6.google.com


    Regards Benny

    ... there can only be one way of life, and it works :)

    --- Msged/LNX 6.2.0 (Linux/3.13.11-gentoo (i686))
    * Origin: duggi.junc.org where qico is waiting (1:261/38.20)
  • From Kees van Eeten@2:280/5003.4 to Benny Pedersen on Wed Apr 30 23:24:56 2014
    Hello Benny!

    30 Apr 14 21:28, you wrote to Scott Little:

    I had a SRV record set up for another IP, but only configured the 6 to
    4 forwarding for one of them. I've removed the SRV record for now,
    I'll fix it properly later.

    just one hostname with both a and aaaa, then its solved, post the hostname in nodelist, be happy

    "dig linode.junc.eu a"
    "dig linode.junc.eu aaaa"

    this way, just with your own hostname :)

    But Scott wants to use "junc.eu" and his fidonode is not his mailserver,
    but his e-mail address is xxxx at junc.eu, well in his case it is ofcource
    sysgod.org. He also wants his homepages to be html://sysgod.org/index.html
    and his voip adress to be SIP:xxxx at sysgod.org etc.

    And when he is all organised, dig sysgod.org will not return an ipaddress.

    Kees

    --- FPD v2.9.040207 GoldED+/LNX 1.1.5
    * Origin: As for me, all I know is that, I know nothing. (2:280/5003.4)
  • From Michiel van der Vlist@2:280/5555 to Scott Little on Thu May 1 12:45:11 2014
    Hello Scott,

    On Wednesday April 30 2014 23:58, you wrote to me:

    I am a bit surprised the ISPs down undah don't put more pressure
    on it. APNIC was the first RIR to deplete its IPv4 stock three
    years ago. By now IPv4 adresses should be scarse in the
    ASIAN-PACIFIC region.

    I think we got in early while there were still plenty of addresses to
    go around.

    When I ask my ISP when they are going to roll out native IPv6, their standard anwer is "no hurry, we still have plenty of IPv4 addresses to meet the demand". And as far as the fixed line providers go, that may be true. Internet penetration is very high in The Netherlands, almost every household has a broadband connection. The market is near saturation. They aren not getting many NEW customers who need an IPv4 address.

    But of course that is only half the story. What they ignore is that:

    Developing countries with larger populations/growing
    markets weren't so lucky. I hear China's been on the IPv6 bandwagon
    for a while.

    Indeed. IPv6 only is rising over there and to reach them I need IPv6.

    For the mobile providers the story is different. They do not issue publicly routable IPv4 adresses any more. Mobile devices get a 10.0.0.0/8 or 100.64.0.0/10 address.

    I guess not many of the smart phone crowd needs to run servers...

    The brokennes of 6to4 is the main reason why most
    OS's/applications first try IPv4 instead of IPv6.

    In the case of 6to4....

    Windows normally tries IPv6 first, but if the destination is a 6to4
    tunnel, it only tries IPv6 if Ipv4 fails.

    That's rather intelligent of them. *stunned*

    I suppose it is their way of saying that 6to4 is not recommended. The same goes for Teredo BTW.

    Forget about 6RD.

    What's wrong with 6RD?

    It is based on the same technology as 6to4, but it avoids some of the problems. So maybe it is good enough for you.

    I suggest you get a decent 6in4 or AYIYA tunnel from a decent
    tunnel broker like he.net or SixXs.

    Hurricane don't have any local POPs.

    You do not really need a local POP unless you need lots of bandwidth.

    Six have one in NZ and they support RDNS, so that might be the way to
    go. None of the other tunnel providers in Oz do RDNS so they're out.

    If you really need SMTP over IPv6 yes. But do your really need that yet?


    Cheers, Michiel

    --- GoldED+/W32-MINGW 1.1.5-b20110320
    * Origin: 2001:470:1f15:1117::1 (2:280/5555)