• Ziggo (my Isp) and IPv6

    From Michiel van der Vlist@2:280/5555 to All on Mon Jun 16 12:28:35 2014
    Hello All,

    There is something going on....

    http://speedtest6.ziggo.nl/


    via my SixXs tunnel : ping 19 ms, Down 8.97 Mbps, Up 2,42 Mbps.

    via my he.net tunnel: ping 16 ms, Down 15,12 Mbps, Up 2,50 Mbps.

    via IPv4 : ping 16 ms, Down 31,54 Mbps, Up 2.96 Mbps.


    Cheers, Michiel

    --- GoldED+/W32-MINGW 1.1.5-b20110320
    * Origin: 2001:470:1f15:1117::1 (2:280/5555)
  • From Benny Pedersen@1:261/38.20 to Michiel van der Vlist on Mon Jun 16 22:26:42 2014
    Hello Michiel!

    16 Jun 2014 12:28, Michiel van der Vlist wrote to All:

    MvdV> There is something going on....

    and its is ?

    MvdV> http://speedtest6.ziggo.nl/

    its working imho ?

    MvdV> via my SixXs tunnel : ping 19 ms, Down 8.97 Mbps, Up 2,42 Mbps.
    MvdV> via my he.net tunnel: ping 16 ms, Down 15,12 Mbps, Up 2,50 Mbps.
    MvdV> via IPv4 : ping 16 ms, Down 31,54 Mbps, Up 2.96 Mbps.

    where is the problem in that SixXs might have more users then he.net ?

    compared to the uplinks pipes of course :)


    Regards Benny

    ... there can only be one way of life, and it works :)

    --- Msged/LNX 6.2.0 (Linux/3.12.21-gentoo-r1 (i686))
    * Origin: duggi.junc.org where qico is waiting (1:261/38.20)
  • From Michiel van der Vlist@2:280/5555 to Benny Pedersen on Tue Jun 17 01:01:59 2014
    Hello Benny,

    On Monday June 16 2014 22:26, you wrote to me:

    MvdV>> There is something going on....

    and its is ?

    They (my ISP) are displaying some IPv6 activity....

    MvdV>> http://speedtest6.ziggo.nl/

    its working imho ?

    Yes, it works.

    MvdV>> SixXs tunnel : ping 19 ms, Down 8.97 Mbps, Up 2,42 Mbps.
    MvdV>> he.net tunnel: ping 16 ms, Down 15,12 Mbps, Up 2,50 Mbps.
    MvdV>> IPv4 : ping 16 ms, Down 31,54 Mbps, Up 2.96 Mbps.

    where is the problem in that SixXs might have more users then he.net ?

    I have no idea why the downlink speeds on IPv6 are less than a third for SixXs and less than half for he.net. Others in The Netherlands report tunnel speeds of more than 90% of their IPv4 speeds.

    compared to the uplinks pipes of course :)

    Indeed, those are pretty good...


    Cheers, Michiel

    --- GoldED+/W32-MINGW 1.1.5-b20110320
    * Origin: 2001:470:1f15:1117::1 (2:280/5555)
  • From Björn Felten@2:203/2 to Michiel van der Vlist on Tue Jun 17 09:07:20 2014
    MvdV> I have no idea why the downlink speeds on IPv6 are less than a third for
    MvdV> SixXs and less than

    SixSS limits the speed to 10Mbps.

    --- Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; sv-SE; rv:1.9.1.16) Gecko/20101125
    * Origin: news://felten.yi.org (2:203/2)
  • From Michiel van der Vlist@2:280/5555 to Björn Felten on Tue Jun 17 12:39:06 2014
    Hello Bj”rn,

    On Tuesday June 17 2014 09:07, you wrote to me:

    MvdV>> I have no idea why the downlink speeds on IPv6 are less than a
    MvdV>> third for SixXs and less than

    SixSS limits the speed to 10Mbps.

    They do? Well, it would explain some of my results.

    OTOH, I wonder. I can't blame the provider of a free service if they prioritize the service in favour of their paying customers. But SixXs is not a monolitic organisation, there is no central control room where there is a knob that they can turn to limit the overall speed. The POPs are autonomous, I would expect each one to decide for themselves if and when how much they throttle down on the speed.

    Anyway, it does not explain my meagre results on my he.net tunnel. He,net does not limit the speed. Fellow IPv6'ers in The Netherlands report less than 10% difference with their high speed (up to 100 Mbps) IPv4 links.

    It could be the Linksys WRT54GL running OpenWrt that is the bottleneck. It may already be running near its limits with my 30 Mbps IPv4 link. Having to handle the he.net tunnel end point on top of that may be too much for it. I can think of no easy way to test that.


    Cheers, Michiel

    --- GoldED+/W32-MINGW 1.1.5-b20110320
    * Origin: 2001:470:1f15:1117::1 (2:280/5555)
  • From Konstantin Kuzov@2:5019/40 to Michiel van der Vlist on Mon Jun 30 22:35:50 2014
    Konnichi wa, *Michiel-kun*! Aogu manako oyobi uketamawaru waga koe!
    Tomodachi _Michiel van der Vlist_ tsukuru airon _All_
    Nichiji - /*16 ˆî­ 14 12:28*/, Daizai - /*Ziggo (my Isp) and IPv6*/:

    MvdV> http://speedtest6.ziggo.nl/

    MvdV> via my SixXs tunnel : ping 19 ms, Down 8.97 Mbps, Up 2,42 Mbps.
    MvdV> via my he.net tunnel: ping 16 ms, Down 15,12 Mbps, Up 2,50 Mbps.
    MvdV> via IPv4 : ping 16 ms, Down 31,54 Mbps, Up 2.96 Mbps.

    My results:

    via he.net tunnel: ping 73ms, Down 87.64 Mbps, Up 87.03 Mbps.
    via IPv4 : ping 63ms, Down 675.64 Mbps, Up 262.52 Mbps.

    Ganbatte, *Michiel*!

    [_N0SF3R@TU_]
    ... GoldED+/LNX 1.1.5 (Linux 3.11.5-gentoo CPU UNKNOWN)
    --- #[Kaori Sekken: Master.NoSFeRaTU[@]Gmail.com] [Kumi Nyaa]#
    * Origin: Ojisan, oriru mottekuru suna oyobi korosu sagaru kabe (2:5019/40)
  • From Michiel van der Vlist@2:280/5555 to Konstantin Kuzov on Tue Jul 1 11:51:55 2014
    Hello Konstantin,

    On Monday June 30 2014 22:35, you wrote to me:

    My results:

    via he.net tunnel: ping 73ms, Down 87.64 Mbps, Up 87.03 Mbps.
    ^^^ ^^^^
    That's very good.

    via IPv4 : ping 63ms, Down 675.64 Mbps, Up 262.52 Mbps.
    ^^^^^ ^^^^
    That's AWSOME!!


    Cheers, Michiel

    --- GoldED+/W32-MINGW 1.1.5-b20110320
    * Origin: 2001:470:1f15:1117::1 (2:280/5555)
  • From Benny Pedersen@1:261/38.20 to Michiel van der Vlist on Thu Jul 3 21:45:52 2014
    Hello Michiel!

    01 Jul 2014 11:51, Michiel van der Vlist wrote to Konstantin Kuzov:

    via he.net tunnel: ping 73ms, Down 87.64 Mbps, Up 87.03 Mbps.
    via IPv4 : ping 63ms, Down 675.64 Mbps, Up 262.52 Mbps.

    i can beat this ping time :)


    Regards Benny

    ... there can only be one way of life, and it works :)

    --- Msged/LNX 6.2.0 (Linux/3.12.21-gentoo-r1 (i686))
    * Origin: duggi.junc.org where qico is waiting (1:261/38.20)
  • From Tommi Koivula@2:221/1.100 to Michiel van der Vlist on Sat Jul 5 10:49:51 2014
    Hello, Michiel van der Vlist.
    On 01/07/2014 11:51 you wrote:

    Hello Konstantin, On Monday June 30 2014 22:35, you wrote to me:
    My results: via he.net tunnel: ping 73ms, Down 87.64 Mbps, Up
    87.03 Mbps.
    ^^^ ^^^^
    That's very good.
    via IPv4 : ping 63ms, Down 675.64 Mbps, Up 262.52 Mbps.
    ^^^^^ ^^^^
    That's AWSOME!! Cheers, Michiel --- GoldED+/W32-MINGW
    1.1.5-b20110320 * Origin: 2001:470:1f15:1117::1 (2:280/5555)

    Naah, ipv6 speed is far behind ipv4 speed. Not awesome indeed. :-)

    --
    'Tommi
    --- Hotdoged/2.10/Android
    * Origin: rbb mobile (2:221/1.100)