3 Systems connected on IPv6.
As one of the three systems that responded on IPv6 connects to my node
using IPv6 several times a day, I think I can add 1 to the three above.
My conclusion is, that 4 uniqe nodes are currently IPv6 ready for Binkp.
My conclusion is, that 4 uniqe nodes are currently IPv6 ready for
Binkp.
Who are the other two? ;)
Bye, Wilfred.
Who are the other two? ;)
The two experts on the matter. Michiel Broek and Andre Grueneberg
The two experts on the matter. Michiel Broek and Andre Grueneberg
I could have guessed that. I have had IPv6 connections with both of them... ;)
My conclusion is, that 4 uniqe nodes are currently IPv6 ready for
Binkp.
Who are the other two? ;)The two experts on the matter. Michiel Broek and Andre Grueneberg
I would like to apologise, to those, whose systems I have been pestering with empty polls.
My conclusion is, that 4 uniqe nodes are currently IPv6 ready
for Binkp.
Who are the other two? ;)
The two experts on the matter. Michiel Broek and Andre Grueneberg
*phew* I was almost afraid, I wouldn't make it for some unknown reason. ;) Are you going to contact the others to check their systems?
I would like to apologise, to those, whose systems I have been
pestering with empty polls.
I noticed you over here but had no idea what you were doing. Thanks for pointing out your reasoning, and it's no bother at all. :)
I doubt you were able to connect via IPv6 here, even though I *do* in
fact
have a weak 6to4 setup here, but it only scores a 7 out of 10 on test-ipv6.com ..
I do plan on setting up a he.net account shortly, I just haven't gotten around to it yet.
I noticed you over here but had no idea what you were doing. Thanks
for pointing out your reasoning, and it's no bother at all. :)
I wonder what you have noticed. I made a DNS request for
bbs.pharcyde.org and got an alias for pharcyde.ath.cx.
I do plan on setting up a he.net account shortly, I just haven't
gotten around to it yet.
I have many roundtoit's in the drawer of my desk.
Only that you connected to my binkd server. My domain points to a free dns
domain, because the free dns can be updated instantly, whereas the paid-for domains seem to usually take an hour or so to update.
Either way, when you hit my router is when you would have noticed IPv6 capabilities.
they think, that they support IPv6, they can check their logs to see what type of connection 2:280/5003 made on 24 Jan 2013 between 17:30 and 20:00 MET.
What ever you call the box. I connected to your dns server.
After what I think is a successful he.net tunnel setup. I'm scoring a
9/10 on test-ipv6.com (only because my ISP doesn't support ipv6). If
you would be so kind as to try again, you can *try* ipv6.pharcyde.org
-- and if that doesn't work, 2001:470:1f11:1027:250:8dff:fec0:ca78
After what I think is a successful he.net tunnel setup. I'm scoring a 9/10 on test-ipv6.com (only because my ISP doesn't support ipv6). If you would be so kind as to try again, you can *try* ipv6.pharcyde.org -- and if that doesn't work, 2001:470:1f11:1027:250:8dff:fec0:ca78
If the real IP works, then godaddy isn't taking care of my AAAA record. If that's the case, let me know and I'll look into it.
Thanks for your continued interest in this, as it's actually
motivating me over here as well. :)
Gotcha!
= 24-Jan-2013 19:29:28 Address : 2:280/5003 2:280/0 2:280/53
My system (including all six computers connected to internet here) score a perfect 10 on test-ipv6, but obviously Argus is not ready for it. :(
Ping6-ing my address works -- but that of course is not much of a comfort...
*phew* I was almost afraid, I wouldn't make it for some unknownWell there were four more systems that used a Binkd.1.0....
reason. ;)
Are you going to contact the others to check their systems?
version. I think the version change to 1.0 was because of the
IPv6 functionality. If not, then it would be interesting to know
in what subversion or build, IPv6 was intruduced.
I can imagine case where outgoing connections will work, but
incoming connections have a problem.
Ping6-ing my address works -- but that of course is not much of aYes, that is the same excuse Michiel gives me every time I bring
comfort...
op the subject. But as moderator of this Echo, he should not have
one.
Not a real binkd test, but it seems to work:
# telnet ipv6.pharcyde.org binkp
Trying 2001:470:1f11:1027:250:8dff:fec0:ca78...
Connected to ipv6.pharcyde.org.
Aapparently it works, Wilfred demonstrated a telnet to your binkp port.
I let Binkd make a connection at 12:02 UTC. Yust before that I
frightened Jim Kulwiki, as I made a mistake in what node to poll.
I won't show a section of my logfile, as the log is on a different
system.
With the inside information that you have a IPv6 address, setting up
Binkd to call on IPv6 first and fall back on IPv4 is easy.
Just make a nodeline with the two hostnames separated by a ","
It would be nice if bbs.pharcyde.org retured both, the IPv6 and the IPv4 address.
The service a dyndns allows for adding a IPv6 address to the same
domain name. Using this service I now have the correct DNS response of IPv4 and IPv6 on one query.
Well apart from, that a nonlisted hostname has to be used, you are
probably the first IPv6 Fidonet node in Z1.
But you are not being loyal to your Zone, you are using Z2 software. ;)
Yes, that is the same excuse Michiel gives me every time I bring op the
subject. But as moderator of this Echo, he should not have one.
Now someone from across the pond has beat you to it. ;)
I'm sure Jim won't be too bothered by it. :)
node 1:154/10@fidonet -md 2001:470:1f11:1027:250:8dff:fec0:ca78,bbs.pharcyde.org <password>
I just payed dyndns.com a visit, and added my IPv6 address to pharcyde.ath.cx (which bbs, www, binkd, and most other CNAMEs point to). Hopefully that does the trick!
The service a dyndns allows for adding a IPv6 address to the same
domain name. Using this service I now have the correct DNS response of
IPv4 and IPv6 on one query.
That's great! I will keep tinkering here and see what I can come up with. It's definitely a "learn as you go" process. :)
Loyalty has nothing to do with it. I'm not going to use junk that hasn't been maintained in over 10 years.
I used:
node 1:154/10@fidonet ipv6.pharcyde.org,bbs.pharcyde.org -
I just payed dyndns.com a visit, and added my IPv6 address to
pharcyde.ath.cx (which bbs, www, binkd, and most other CNAMEs point
to). Hopefully that does the trick!
I tried from different system, I only got the ipv4 address.
I have a vage memory, that you there was something nit straitforward in getting dyndns to accept de opdate. Currently my update routine
manages to update both addresses.
Well I still use 10 year old software, but at least the sources are available.
Go ahead and give another try when you have the time. I realized about an hour after I added the IPv6 address to dyndns.com it removed itself. I googled a bit and found out that if you run an update script or client on the IPv4 address, it wipes the IPv6 entry. So for now I added the v6 address back in and have turned off my update script.
If you know of a good way to update the v6 address when the v4 address is updated, please share!
Especially taking into account that implementing some TCP-proxy that allows connections via IPv6 to IPv4-only software should be simple.
I introduced IPv6 in binkd 1.0a-563 and the following commits ... see HISTORY file. Binkd got a 1.0 a while later, around June last year.
Of course -- I can also imagine situations where the OS prefers IPv4 over IPv6. At least my system is dual stack and some OSs have tuned their getaddrinfo() for different strategies.
If you know of a good way to update the v6 address when the v4
address is updated, please share!
Yes I remember that, but I run the update once a day, the lease time of my dynamic address is over 30 days. In practice it does not change unless
the provider changes hardware, or I release the address for some time.
I changed the update software I originally used to ddclient.
Ddclient is standard available in the Debian distribution.
The following snippet of the configuration file does the trick.
use=if, if=eth1
usev6=ip, ip=2001:888:132a::34
mx=mail.ddutch.nl
By the way your dns responce is now correct and I used it to make a call.
By accident I bothered Jim again, apologies to him.
Success.
Now someone from across the pond has beat you to it. ;)
Now someone from across the pond has beat you to it. ;)I don't really mind being beaten by such a nice person. :)
I made some changes here -- not that I think it'll work, but if
some
would bother to test, I'm all ears.
I'm still somewhat suspicious about Argus' IPv6 capability. Anyone knows about an IPv6 capable Argus system?
To bad, it failed on IPv6 Time 22:52:47
To bad, it failed on IPv6 Time 22:52:47
Well, now at least traceroute6 works all the way -- even if the last hop takes some time -- so I must be one step closer to the goal.
Thanks for the swift response!
Sorry, maybe I misunderstood. Are you trying to connect to me?
I don't really mind being beaten by such a nice person. :)
I made some changes here -- not that I think it'll work, but if some would bother to test, I'm all ears.
I'm still somewhat suspicious about Argus' IPv6 capability. Anyone knows about an IPv6 capable Argus system?
Especially taking into account that implementing some TCP-proxy thatI know this is done with e.g. DD-WRT to connect an internal IPv6
allows connections via IPv6 to IPv4-only software should be simple.
lan to a IPv4 internet connection. I can imagine that it can work
the otherway around, but can it coexeist with a IPv6 tunnel.
Could the proxy be implemented on a IPv6 capable Win-XP, that
also hosts the IPv4 software.
Sysop: | Nelgin |
---|---|
Location: | Plano, TX |
Users: | 611 |
Nodes: | 10 (1 / 9) |
Uptime: | 49:18:50 |
Calls: | 9,831 |
Files: | 16,216 |
Messages: | 1,080,456 |