In Region 15 ZIN 2 and 3 were removed (both were AKA's of the ZC.
In Region 15 ZIN 2 and 3 were removed (both were AKA's of the ZC.
Wrong! They used to be AKAs of the RC.
In net 469 (Moldova_Net), 14 entries were removed, 5 remain:
2:469/0 f0.n469.z2.binkp.net - Error: Cannot getaddrinfo -
Name
or service not known
2:469/15 f15.n469.z2.binkp.net:24554 188.237.176.55 Error: No route to host
2:469/122 fidonet.zuram.net:24554 2001:470:71:77b:f1d0:2:469:122 Ok.
2:469/122 fidonet.zuram.net:24554 95.65.53.77 Ok.
2:469/335 f335.n469.z2.dyn.binkp.net - Error: Cannot getaddrinfo - Name or service not known
In net 469 (Moldova_Net), 14 entries were removed, 5 remain:
2:469/0 f0.n469.z2.binkp.net - Error: Cannot getaddrinfo -
Name
or service not known
2:469/15 f15.n469.z2.binkp.net:24554 188.237.176.55
Error: No route to host
2:469/122 fidonet.zuram.net:24554
2001:470:71:77b:f1d0:2:469:122 Ok.
2:469/122 fidonet.zuram.net:24554 95.65.53.77 Ok.
2:469/335 f335.n469.z2.dyn.binkp.net - Error: Cannot
getaddrinfo - Name or service not known
Hm...
[fido@brorabbit golded]$ cat ~/logs/callip.log
2023-12-02 14:57:12.191 callip.pl v.0.9.6.0. -c /home/fido/etc/callip.conf
-b -n 469 2023-12-02 14:57:12.270 Finding last nodelist file from /home/fido/nodelist/nodelist.367. 2023-12-02 14:57:12.298 Last nodelist found at 0.027 seconds. 2023-12-02 14:57:12.338 Nodelist for Saturday, December 2, 2023 -- Day number 336 parsed, 4 IP-nodes processed (0.040 sec)
2023-12-02 14:57:12.390 Calling 2:469/0
2023-12-02 14:57:12.390 f0.n469.z2.binkp.net:24554
2023-12-02 14:57:12.390 Error: Cannot getaddrinfo - ¥¨§¢¥á⮥ ¨¬ï ¨«¨ á«ã¦¡ 2023-12-02 14:57:12.471 Calling 2:469/335 2023-12-02 14:57:12.471 f335.n469.z2.dyn.binkp.net:24554 2023-12-02 14:57:12.471 Error: Cannot getaddrinfo - ¥¨§¢¥á⮥ ¨¬ï ¨«¨ á«ã¦¡ 2023-12-02 14:57:13.012 Calling 2:469/122 2023-12-02 14:57:13.012 fidonet.zuram.net:24554 2023-12-02 14:57:13.012 2001:470:71:77b:f1d0:2:469:122 - Ok. 2023-12-02 14:57:13.012
95.65.53.77 - Ok. 2023-12-02 14:57:13.347 Calling 2:469/15 2023-12-02 14:57:13.347 f15.n469.z2.binkp.net:24554 2023-12-02 14:57:13.347 188.237.176.55 - Ok.
There is indeed improvement since yesterday. /15 Is connectable now.
2:469/0 f0.n469.z2.binkp.net - Error: Cannot getaddrinfo -
Name
or service not known
2:469/15 f15.n469.z2.binkp.net:24554 188.237.176.55 Ok.
Also in R15 nets 305 307 310 311 312 317 and 3005 were removed. The remaining 5 nodes were added to Net 128 as nodes 256 to 260.:
1:128/256 cscnetgw.net:24554 47.49.255.16 No such AKA. 1:128/257 bbs.castlerockbbs.com:24554 72.24.172.12 Error: No route to host
1:128/258 idomain.synchro.net:24554 142.171.158.145 Ok. 1:128/259 bbs.mayorlormar.com - Error: Cannot getaddrinfo -
Name or service not known
There is an error in the entry for node 260: ,260,8-Bit_Boyz_BBS,Rio_Rancho_NM,Shane_O'Neill,-Unpublished-,9600,CM,INA:b
bs.8bitboyz.com:IBN
In net 469 (Moldova_Net), 14 entries were removed, 5 remain:
2:469/0 f0.n469.z2.binkp.net - Error: Cannot getaddrinfo -
Name or service not known
2:469/335 f335.n469.z2.dyn.binkp.net - Error: Cannot getaddrinfo - Name or service not known
Wilfred van Velzen wrote to All <=-
Also in R15 nets 305 307 310 311 312 317 and 3005 were removed. The remaining 5 nodes were added to Net 128 as nodes 256 to 260.:
1:128/256 cscnetgw.net:24554 47.49.255.16 No such AKA. 1:128/257 bbs.castlerockbbs.com:24554 72.24.172.12 Error: No route to host
1:128/258 idomain.synchro.net:24554 142.171.158.145 Ok. 1:128/259 bbs.mayorlormar.com - Error: Cannot getaddrinfo -
Name or service not known
No improvement here this week. Actually the overall situation in
net 128 got worse:
1:128/0 cscnet1.net:24554 47.49.255.5 Error: Connection refused
1:128/1 cscnet1.net:24554 47.49.255.5 Error: Connection refused
1:128/73 opinsane.noip.me:24554 207.225.26.65 Ok.
1:128/187 cscnet1.net:24554 47.49.255.5 Error: Connection refused 1:128/255 sb-discovery.com:24554 47.49.255.9 Ok.
1:128/256 cscnetgw.net:24554 47.49.255.16 No such AKA.
1:128/257 bbs.castlerockbbs.com:24554 72.24.172.12 Error: No
route to host 1:128/258 idomain.synchro.net:24554 142.171.158.145
Ok. 1:128/261 vintagebbsing.com:24554 47.49.255.14 Ok.
1:128/262 beta.sb-discovery.com:24554 47.49.255.12 Error: No
route to host
(Node 259 got marked Down this week)
There is an error in the entry for node 260:
b
bs.8bitboyz.com:IBN
No change here.
Makes me wonder why RC15 has been allowed to even keep the job for
this long. Effin' pitiful.
Makes me wonder why RC15 has been allowed to even keep the job for Wv>DC> this long. Effin' pitiful.
I've been wondering about that myself... Probably because people don't care, or don't know...
I've been wondering about that myself... Probably because people
don't care, or don't know...
As it is in Z2 and its ZC, in Z1 the corresponding ZC has his reasons
for running the zone as he sees fit. That's his prerogative.
Zones do not operate in isolation. We all use the same nodelist. If there is garbage in he nodelist it affects us all.
Zones do not operate in isolation. We all use the same nodelist.
If there is garbage in he nodelist it affects us all.
I fail to see how the presence of a dysfunctional net or region, with
whom you never communicate, affects you.
The space it occupies on disc hasn't been a valid argument for over 2 decades either.
Then I will return the favour by retroactively failing to understand why last year you made such a fuss about the hundreds/thousands of 1:229/9xxx "new sysops" entries. How did that garbage in a rouge net in another zone affect you?
Then I will return the favour by retroactively failing to
understand why last year you made such a fuss about the
hundreds/thousands of 1:229/9xxx "new sysops" entries. How did
that garbage in a rouge net in another zone affect you?
Maybe because of P4.07.1.Par-1 2nd sentence?
As it is in Z2 and its ZC, in Z1 the corresponding ZC has his reasons
for running the zone as he sees fit. That's his prerogative.
No improvement here this week. Actually the overall situation in net
128 got worse:
1:128/0 cscnet1.net:24554 47.49.255.5 Error: Connection refused
1:128/1 cscnet1.net:24554 47.49.255.5 Error: Connection refused
1:128/73 opinsane.noip.me:24554 207.225.26.65 Ok.
1:128/187 cscnet1.net:24554 47.49.255.5 Error: Connection refused 1:128/255 sb-discovery.com:24554 47.49.255.9 Ok.
1:128/256 cscnetgw.net:24554 47.49.255.16 No such AKA.
1:128/257 bbs.castlerockbbs.com:24554 72.24.172.12 Error: No route to host
1:128/258 idomain.synchro.net:24554 142.171.158.145 Ok.
1:128/261 vintagebbsing.com:24554 47.49.255.14 Ok.
1:128/262 beta.sb-discovery.com:24554 47.49.255.12 Error: No route to host
No improvement here this week. Actually the overall situation in net
128 got worse:
1:128/0 cscnet1.net:24554 47.49.255.5 Error: Connection refused
1:128/1 cscnet1.net:24554 47.49.255.5 Error: Connection refused
1:128/73 opinsane.noip.me:24554 207.225.26.65 Ok.
1:128/187 cscnet1.net:24554 47.49.255.5 Error: Connection refused
1:128/255 sb-discovery.com:24554 47.49.255.9 Ok.
1:128/256 cscnetgw.net:24554 47.49.255.16 No such AKA.
1:128/257 bbs.castlerockbbs.com:24554 72.24.172.12 Error: No route
to host
1:128/258 idomain.synchro.net:24554 142.171.158.145 Ok.
1:128/261 vintagebbsing.com:24554 47.49.255.14 Ok.
1:128/262 beta.sb-discovery.com:24554 47.49.255.12 Error: No route
to host
And it got worse again:
1:128/255 sb-discovery.com:24554 47.49.255.9 Error: Connection refused
Current status of net 128:
1:128/0 cscnet1.net:24554 47.49.255.5 Ok.
1:128/1 cscnet1.net:24554 47.49.255.5 Ok.
1:128/73 opinsane.noip.me:24554 102.129.145.77 Error: Connection refused
1:128/187 cscnet1.net:24554 47.49.255.5 Ok.
1:128/252 bbs.lamersfam.com:24554 70.171.253.181 Error: Connection timed out
1:128/253 barlows1.net:24554 47.49.255.2 Error: Connection timed out
1:128/255 sb-discovery.com:24554 47.49.255.9 Error: Connection refused
1:128/256 cscnetgw.net:24554 47.49.255.16 No such AKA. 1:128/257 bbs.castlerockbbs.com:24554 72.24.172.12 Error: No route to host
1:128/258 idomain.synchro.net:24554 142.171.158.145 Ok. 1:128/261 vintagebbsing.com:24554 47.49.255.14 Ok.
1:128/262 beta.sb-discovery.com:24554 47.49.255.12 Error: Connection timed out
Nodes 260 and 263 aren't tested by the script because of the nodelist errors, but checking the binkp port by hand with telnet reveals that 260 is
up and 263 is down.
Sysop: | Nelgin |
---|---|
Location: | Plano, TX |
Users: | 606 |
Nodes: | 10 (1 / 9) |
Uptime: | 22:15:08 |
Calls: | 9,621 |
Calls today: | 3 |
Files: | 16,063 |
Messages: | 1,063,014 |